An Analysis of the Fidelity Implementation Policies of the What Works Clearinghouse
Keywords: implementation fidelity, What Works Clearinghouse, evidence screening, systematic reviews, program evaluation
AbstractA large body of literature documents the central importance of fidelity of program implementation in creating an internally valid research design and considering such fidelity in judgments of research quality. The What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) provides web-based summary ratings of educational innovations and is the only rating group that is officially sponsored by the U.S. Department of Education. Yet, correspondence with the organization indicates that it disregards information regarding implementation fidelity in its summary ratings, relying on âreplicated findingsâ and suggesting that any fidelity issues that âmay have arisen are averaged.â This paper demonstrates the fallacy in this logic. Simulations show that the policy minimizes the positive impact of highly effective programs and the negative impact of highly ineffective programs. Implications are discussed.
How to Cite
Stockard, J. (2010). An Analysis of the Fidelity Implementation Policies of the What Works Clearinghouse. Current Issues in Education, 13(4). Retrieved from https://cie.asu.edu/ojs/index.php/cieatasu/article/view/398
Authors hold the copyright to articles published in Current Issues in Education. Requests to reprint CIE articles in other journals should be addressed to the author. Reprints should credit CIE as the original publisher and include the URL of the CIE publication. Permission is hereby granted to copy any article, provided CIE is credited and copies are not sold.